Commit graph

1006 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
6a32acb3aa fix(competitors): size-weight avg velocity by flats_total (#949 audit, option B)
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 6s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 2m32s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 3m10s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m56s
weighted_avg_velocity was a naive mean despite the name — a 500-flat ЖК weighed
the same as a 20-flat one. Now count-weighted by flats_total (sql.md AVG
principle): Σ(velocity*flats_total)/Σ(flats_total). Competitors with unknown
flats_total are excluded from weights; if sizes are unknown for ALL, graceful
fallback to the simple mean (den>0 guard). Field name + API contract UNCHANGED
(zero consumer ripple — traced: only CompetitorsSummary, no frontend ref).

Tests: equal sizes → weighted==naive (existing 6.0 stays); NEW test with
500-flat@40 + 20-flat@2 → 38.54 (not naive 21.0), proving the weighting.
2026-06-04 14:05:20 +05:00
b4eb6a8ad5 fix(forecasting): honest USP gate (di>0) + unit-explicit coverage fraction
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 6s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 2m16s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m31s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m3s
Found by read-only services audit.
- recommendation._usp_from_deficits: skip di<=0 so «стройте его» is never emitted
  for OVERSUPPLIED formats; all-surplus top-K → [] (no white-space niches).
  Aligns with product_scoring._count_positive_usp (di>0). Was: «Дефицит формата
  X — стройте его» for a surplus format, reaching PDF/Excel USP-ниши.
- report_assembler._domrf_coverage: drop ambiguous >1.0 percent-guess; normalize
  per-branch (analyze pct /100, supply_layers fraction as-is). Sub-1% coverage
  (0.8%) no longer read as 80% → no inflated confidence in the near-zero-coverage
  case §15 flags. tests for both + end-to-end no-inflation. 241+148 pass.
2026-06-04 13:25:25 +05:00
5f60668642 fix(nspd-geo): coerce geom to MultiPolygon + wide cad_buildings schema in on-demand ingest
All checks were successful
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m8s
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m35s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m19s
REAL code-level cause (prod-confirmed, 2 parcels: "Geometry type (Polygon) does
not match column type (MultiPolygon)") of single-contour parcels stuck "fetching"
— complements migrations 129/130 (which fixed the cad_parcels NOT NULL chain).

F1: _save_parcel/_save_quarter now ST_Multi() the geom so single-contour Polygons
fit the MultiPolygon columns (migr 93/58), mirroring the bulk_harvest paths.
F2: _save_building rewritten to the wide cad_buildings schema (migr 92):
quarter_cad_number (was quarter_cad_num → UndefinedColumn), _safe_int(floors)
(range strings → NULL), source='nspd' NOT NULL.
F3: upsert_features wraps each feature in begin_nested() SAVEPOINT so one bad
feature no longer aborts the whole quarter snapshot (backend.md rule; mirrors
grid-walk). New tests/workers/test_nspd_geo.py + savepoint tests. 89 passed.
2026-06-04 13:11:47 +05:00
3cea915e48 feat(site-finder): clickable parcel markers open analysis from the map
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 6s
Deploy / build-backend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-worker (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Successful in 2m47s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m7s
Marker click opens an interactive Leaflet popup with a primary "Открыть анализ"
action that navigates to /site-finder/analysis/<cad> (encodeURIComponent —
matches the [cad] route's single-decode contract) and records the visit in
RecentParcels. Hover tooltip enriched with status + actionable hint. Existing
ParcelDrawer preview kept, reachable via the popup's secondary "Подробнее".
ESLint + tsc clean.
2026-06-04 12:50:37 +05:00
51966b38c8 fix(db): default cad_parcels.source in trigger (on-demand ingest 2nd NOT NULL gap)
Some checks failed
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 39s
Deploy / deploy (push) Has been cancelled
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 6s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 36s
After #129 fixed quarter_cad_number, the on-demand НСПД ingest of a real
not-pre-loaded parcel hit the NEXT cad_parcels NOT NULL column: source
(NotNullViolation) → geometry transaction rolled back → POST /analyze still
stuck. Repro 66:41:0610029:83 (job 57: quarter derived by #129, source null).

Migration 130: extend the #129 BEFORE INSERT/UPDATE trigger function to also
default source→'nspd' when NULL (column DEFAULT can't help — INSERT binds
explicit NULL; trigger overrides it). Explicit sources ("search"/"wms_grid_walk")
respected — only NULL is filled. cad_parcels NOT NULL surface now fully covered
(cad_num/quarter[#129]/category_id[literal]/source[#130]/fetched_at+updated_at[NOW]).
Dry-run-verified on prod: null quarter+source → 66:41:0610029 + nspd, INSERT ok.
2026-06-04 12:49:46 +05:00
45d5a338ea fix(db): auto-derive cad_parcels.quarter_cad_number trigger (on-demand ingest 500)
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 29s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 29s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 58s
PROD bug: on-demand НСПД ingest (bulk_harvest.upsert_parcel, for parcels NOT
pre-loaded) intermittently inserts quarter_cad_number=NULL at runtime →
NotNullViolation → geometry never persists → POST /analyze for a real new parcel
stuck "Геометрия загружается из НСПД…" forever (re-enqueues each call). Repro:
66:41:0610029:83 (real НСПД parcel; failing row had valid geom + props, only
quarter_cad_number null). Code derives quarter_cad but NULL still reaches the
INSERT via some runtime path (grid-walk).

Migration 129: BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE trigger on cad_parcels — when
quarter_cad_number IS NULL and cad_num has >=3 colon-segments, derive it
(first 3 segments: 66:41:0610029:83 → 66:41:0610029). Fixes ALL write paths at
the DB level (quarter_cad_number is a pure derivation of cad_num). <3-segment
cad_num intentionally left NULL → NOT NULL still rejects genuine garbage (no
masking). Coexists with m.92 set_updated_at trigger. Idempotent.

Dry-run-verified on prod catalog: null-quarter insert → derived 66:41:0610029;
garbage <3seg still rejected. Verification = re-fetch 0610029:83 post-deploy.
2026-06-04 12:19:21 +05:00
3945d54e3b fix(#945): indicator-aware default region in macro reader + document debt data-quality
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 6s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 2m53s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 3m19s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m10s
FOLLOW-UP (Leha: not a bug, follow-up).

get_macro_series / get_latest_macro defaulted region='rf', but CBR mortgage_*
series live under 'sverdl' in macro_indicator (key_rate under 'rf'). Only caller
passes region explicitly so no active leak, but a future caller omitting region
would silently get None — latent footgun. region now str|None; when None →
_canonical_region (mortgage set sourced from _CBR_SERIES_MAP, single source of
truth). Explicit region always wins → existing callers unchanged. Region-binding
tests added. 159 tests pass.

Documented (NOT code-fixed — upstream data-quality): mortgage_debt /
mortgage_overdue stay empty in macro_indicator because cbr_mortgage_series.period
holds value-like garbage (e.g. '10054588.0') for the Debt series — corruption
from the upstream CBR-XLSX scraper that built domrf.db (imported verbatim by
44_import_anton_db.py), NOT an ingest bug. 123_macro_indicator.sql correctly
skips unparseable periods. Needs a separate scraper re-ingest (idempotent
backfill once period is valid). Refs #945
2026-06-04 11:49:41 +05:00
9a845646fd fix(#978): train-only detrend in rate backtest + Almon distributed-lag regression
All checks were successful
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m9s
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m29s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m20s
REOPENED 951-B §9.6.
PART A: fix look-ahead leakage in backtest_rate_sensitivity --detrend. The
ln(units) trend was fit over train+test then split, so test data shaped the
detrend and inflated the OOS hit-rate. _detrend_log now takes fit_n; backtest_tier
fits the trend on TRAIN months only (same split evaluate_oos uses) and projects
(a,b) point-in-time onto test. Default fit_n=None preserves prior behaviour.

PART B (DoD): new app/services/forecasting/regression.py — Almon polynomial
distributed-lag (deg 2) of Δln(district demand) on Δkey_rate lags 0..6 via
OLS-on-Almon-regressors (numpy lstsq) + per-lag reconstruction + manual
Newey-West HAC SEs (NO statsmodels). Output {best_lag_months, coef=long-run
multiplier, x_pct, r2, n, per_lag_coef, hac_se,...}; gate mirrors _elasticity_coef
(n<30 OR R²<0.1 OR Σβ≥0 → fallback); §9.6 phrase from the lag shape. ADVISORY,
shipped standalone (integration point documented), NOT wired — protects the live
compute_rate_sensitivity consumers.

125+31 tests (synthetic known-lag recovery, HAC computed/differs-from-OLS,
fallback gating, no-leakage detrend). ruff clean. Refs #978
2026-06-04 11:39:32 +05:00
3ecfc2d7dc feat(forecasting): seasonal (month-of-year) demand normalization (#979)
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 6s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m16s
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m28s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m6s
REOPENED — normalize.py was never created; only rate-regime discount existed.
New backend/app/services/forecasting/normalize.py with normalize_demand(series):
multiplicative month-of-year deseasonalization of the raw monthly demand
SalesSeries (§9.4). Pure/deterministic; min-data guard (<2 full years / empty
month / overall_mean<=0 → factor 1.0, no divide-by-zero, no thin-data noise).
Exposes seasonal factors for explainability. Synthetic unit test: seasonality
removed (month means equalised), flat unchanged, thin/empty/all-zero safe.

DoD (module + doc + test) MET. Production wiring into
rate_sensitivity._align_sales_deltas DEFERRED (documented TODO): deseasonalizing
the short rate-driven series perturbs the recovered β/lag on current data —
needs a points-per-month gate / joint seasonal+rate estimation + backtest before
wiring. Forecast stack is advisory regardless. Refs #979
2026-06-04 11:19:50 +05:00
9ff80f3ac0 fix(forecasting): #980 strongest deficit→deficit_index +1.0; #981 MAI uses CBR key rate
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 6s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m7s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m39s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m39s
REOPENED #980: when effective competing supply is exhausted under positive demand
(projected_supply<=0, demand>0), deficit_index now caps to +1.0 (peak of [-1,+1])
instead of None. balance_ratio stays None (demand/0 undefined), but the strongest
build signal no longer reads downstream as thin data (market_fit fell to 0.5,
what_to_build dropped the cell). No-signal (supply<=0 AND demand<=0) stays None.

REOPENED #981: MAI now uses CBR key rate (macro_indicator key_rate/rf via
get_monthly_macro) as the market borrowing-cost proxy (~16-21%) instead of the
subsidized weighted rate (~7.83%), per §7.9 DoD. rate_kind='key_rate_proxy'.
If key_rate absent → rate_kind='market_unavailable' (no silent subsidy fallback).
Income (#946) still missing → payment_to_income None, confidence low.

778 forecasting tests green. Refs #980 #981
2026-06-04 11:10:26 +05:00
33d1a63bc8 fix(exporters): read real SiteFinderReport keys in PDF/Excel (#989, #991)
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m18s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 6m57s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m19s
REOPENED. PDF + Excel exporters read non-existent dict keys, so demand/supply/
scenario columns silently rendered "—". Tests passed only because the fixtures
were stale (hand-typed the same wrong keys → fixture agreed with buggy exporter).

- future_market: demand/supply → projected_demand_units/projected_supply_units
- scenarios: drop non-existent per-scenario "overall"; show primary-horizon
  deficit_index from ScenarioForecast.forecasts (scoring.overall was NOT broken)
- Excel #991: add missing future_supply (index + breakdown) + confidence.factors
  sections; add future_supply to PDF for parity
- tests: rebuild forecast/scenario fixtures from real DemandSupplyForecast /
  ScenarioForecast as_dict(); contract-key regression guards fail on key-drift
  (verified: reintroducing old keys fails the new tests). 28 passed.

Refs #989 #991
2026-06-04 10:56:51 +05:00
2b3759af6a fix(market-metrics): count window sales by contract_date, not 17-day history (#949 CRITICAL)
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m31s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m34s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 57s
REOPENED. _SALES_WINDOW_SQL derived "sales in window" from objective_lots_history
snapshots, but history is only ~17 days deep — every currently-sold lot had a
sold-snapshot in the window, so window-sales collapsed into the entire cumulative
sold stock (Автовокзал 6mo: 33,245 vs real ~2,308). Inflated absorption_rate
(~235%/mo with confidence=high), months_of_supply, unit_velocity, liquidity,
demand_concentration → contaminated forecast #950/#952.

Count window sales directly from objective_lots by contract_date in the window
(the real sale date — present on 100% of sold lots: 41,091/41,091). Return
contract of _query_sales_window unchanged (units/area/by-room ROLLUP); downstream
formulas untouched. Removed the now-dead objective_lots_history JOIN/CTE.
Regression test: lots sold outside window (contract_date out of range) not counted
(41,091 cumulative vs 2,308 window → absorption 2.35→0.04). 288 tests green.

Verification = prod compute_market_metrics(Автовокзал) post-deploy. Refs #949
2026-06-04 10:46:50 +05:00
ed3b302d57 fix(supply-layers): thread dev_group_name into L3 upsert key (#970 CRITICAL)
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 6s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m22s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m32s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m4s
REOPENED. L3 future-supply rows are computed per (district_name, dev_group_name)
but dev_group_name was never a key column — only embedded in method text. With
complex_id/obj_class NULL for L3, every dev_group of a district collapsed to one
upsert key → ~95.6% loss. Ground-truth (Академический, prod): should be 13,808
units / 15 dev_groups / 54 objects; only 1 row / 607 units survived.

Migration 128: ADD COLUMN supply_layers.dev_group_name TEXT + rebuild
uq_supply_layers_logical to (layer, district_name, complex_id, obj_class,
dev_group_name, source, snapshot_date) NULLS NOT DISTINCT (L1/L2 dev_group_name
NULL stays transparent → their dedup unchanged; L3 distinct groups no longer
collapse). Dry-run-verified vs prod catalog (applies clean, ROLLBACK clean).

Worker: SupplyLayerRow gains dev_group_name (L1/L2=None, L3=group); _UPSERT_SQL
adds it to INSERT/VALUES (CAST(:dev_group_name AS text)) + ON CONFLICT (key col,
not in DO UPDATE SET). Service+worker regression tests assert same-district/
different-dev_group → distinct keys (no collapse). 234 supply tests pass.

Deploy applies migration before container restart; collapsed data self-heals on
next supply_layers_refresh. Verification = prod re-measure post-deploy.

Refs #970
2026-06-04 10:06:30 +05:00
85c43ff68b fix(analyze): cad_exists_in_db must require non-NULL geometry
All checks were successful
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 2m34s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 2m11s
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 6s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 3m10s
Complements the NULL-geom 500 fix. cad_exists_in_db (docstring: "is there
GEOMETRY") checked only row existence, not geom IS NOT NULL — so for the ~964
meta-but-NULL-geom parcels it returned True. Consequence after the 500 fix:
such a parcel fell into the analyze fallback, find_or_enqueue_fetch step 2 saw
cad_exists_in_db=True → returned ("ready", None) → NO NSPD fetch enqueued →
analyze looped to a 202 with job_id=null and the parcel was stuck "fetching"
forever (never pulled real geometry, never resolved).

Fix: add `AND geom IS NOT NULL` to all three EXISTS branches (aligns the
function with its docstring). Now a NULL-geom parcel → cad_exists_in_db=False →
a real NSPD fetch is enqueued (202 + real job_id) → geometry populates →
re-poll → analyze succeeds (or 404 not_in_nspd if NSPD lacks it). No more
stuck-202. Valid-geom parcels unaffected. All 3 callers want geometry-presence
semantics. 37 analyze/fetch/by-bbox tests green. Refs #944.
2026-06-03 19:59:59 +05:00
cdfa4b3ab4 fix(analyze): 500 on parcels with NULL geometry (random-parcel crash)
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 6s
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m38s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 3m12s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m6s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
POST /analyze 500'd (TypeError: float(None)) for ~964 cad_parcels_geom rows
that have a meta row but geom IS NULL: the resolution query returned the row
(no NULL filter), geom_wkt became NULL → ST_Centroid(NULL) → NULL lat/lon →
float(centroid_row["lat"]) crashed (the `if centroid_row else` guard checked
row existence, not NULL values). A user entering any such "random parcel" hit
a 500.

Fix:
- Add `AND geom IS NOT NULL` to all three geometry-resolution queries (initial
  UNION, inline-refetch UNION, geom_row WKT subquery) so a NULL-geometry parcel
  is treated as "no usable geometry" → falls into the #93 graceful fallback
  (enqueue NSPD on-demand fetch → 202 polling), exactly like a parcel absent
  from the DB. The fetch then populates real geometry and analyze succeeds.
- Defensive: centroid_lat/lon now check the VALUE is not None (not just row
  existence) before float(), falling back to EKB center.

Verified: badformat→400, not-in-DB→202(fetching), valid parcel→200 unaffected.
39 analyze/by-bbox tests green. Refs #944.
2026-06-03 19:50:06 +05:00
e9585bcd3b test(suite): re-align drifted tests with current code (CI-rehab 2/3)
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 1m8s
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 36s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m13s
Suite was uncollectable for a while → code evolved, mocks didn't (42 failed /
5 errors → 1687 passed / 0 failed / 0 errors). TEST-ONLY, no app code changed,
no real bugs found (code-reviewed  — no test weakened to fake-green).

- best_layouts: sum_deals→deals_window rename; velocity-scaling direction for
  new SF-01 divisors (last_month=1.0/last_year=12.0)
- quarter_dump_lookup: 7→10-tuple mock rows (risks/opportunity/red_lines cols);
  fix early-exit call-counts for the cad_zouit fallback (#232)
- cadastre_bulk: add xmin/ymin/xmax/ymax to harvest-quarter db mock
- nspd_client: add required QuarterDump.opportunity
- TopLayoutRow: add required is_oversold
- analyze_{market_price,recent_permits,inline_weights}: SQL-signature dispatch
  instead of fragile positional db.execute indices (SF-B5 query reorder; also
  fixes a double-POST geom-starvation false-negative)
- custom_pois: move centroid >15km so center_bonus=0 isolates custom-POI delta
- layout/report PDF: runtime WeasyPrint probe (skip macOS dev, RUN on CI)
- mv_layout SQL: normalize +psycopg DSN + connectivity-probe skipif
- admin token tests: skip (X-Admin-Token gate removed #437/#426; protection is
  Caddy basic_auth + RBAC, covered by test_rbac)

Refs #944.
2026-06-03 19:05:43 +05:00
0247f13fb6 test(rbac): test-mode bypass so api/v1 suite can authenticate (CI-rehab 1/3)
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m35s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m49s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m13s
The whole backend api/v1 test suite hits `app` via TestClient mimo Caddy, so
rbac_guard (app/main.py) 401'd every authed request (no X-Authenticated-User)
— 112 tests red, the suite effectively dead (which is how #994's district 500
shipped uncaught). Add `settings.testing` (default False — prod RBAC untouched)
+ a strictly-gated bypass at the top of rbac_guard; tests/conftest.py enables it
(env TESTING=1 + settings.testing=True before app import).

Security: bypass fires ONLY when settings.testing is True, which is set NOWHERE
in prod (default False; only tests/conftest.py flips it). RBAC's 401/403 logic
stays covered by tests/test_rbac.py (its own middleware copy, ignores the flag).

Effect: 112 → 42 failed, 1590 → 1660 passed. Remaining 42 (+5 mv_layout env
errors) are stale-mock/assertion drift + env-required tests — fixed in CI-rehab
2/3. Foundation for a real Forgejo pytest gate (3/3).

Refs #944.
2026-06-03 18:29:20 +05:00
c8ab3e8be9 fix(analyze): district KeyError 500 in #994 persist + revive by-bbox tests
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m31s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m28s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m44s
LIVE BUG (from #994, already merged): the analysis_runs persist call-site in
analyze_parcel extracted district via result_payload["district"]["district_name"]
— but a district dict without that key (real data: partial district lookup)
raised KeyError OUTSIDE the best-effort SAVEPOINT (extraction is at the call
site, not inside persist_analysis_run) → 500 on the LIVE /analyze endpoint.
Fix: .get("district_name") → None instead of raising. Caught by reviving the
analyze test suite (below).

Test-infra (the suite was un-runnable, which is why the bug shipped):
- Lazy-import WeasyPrint in layout_tz_pdf.py + trade_in_pdf.py (matches the
  existing report_pdf.py / snapshot_pdf.py pattern). The eager top-level imports
  made `app.main` (→ parcels/trade_in routers) un-importable on hosts without
  WeasyPrint native libs (e.g. macOS dev), breaking pytest COLLECTION of the
  whole api/v1 suite. WeasyPrint is still imported when a PDF is actually rendered.
- tests/conftest.py: autouse fixture clears app.dependency_overrides after each
  test (anti-leak — a leaked get_db override caused real-DB connection attempts).
- test_parcel_by_bbox.py: rewrite get_db mocking from patch("...get_db") (a no-op
  — FastAPI Depends holds the original ref) to app.dependency_overrides[get_db],
  add explicit X-Authenticated-User header (RBAC gate), patch latest_run_dates,
  + a new test asserting last_analysis_date from a latest run (#994). 5/5 green.

NOTE: reviving collectability exposes PRE-EXISTING rot in other api/v1 suites
(analyze/admin/best_layouts: RBAC-header + stale-assertion/mock drift) — those
are NOT regressions from this PR (they were uncollectable before) and are
tracked separately for a deliberate suite-rehab + CI test-gate effort.

Refs #994.
2026-06-03 18:04:37 +05:00
72eae3bc9b feat(parcels): persist analysis runs + real last_analysis_date (#994)
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m35s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m31s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m42s
Persist each successful POST /analyze into analysis_runs (migration 127):
best-effort SAVEPOINT-wrapped INSERT in a thin analysis_runs repository, then
explicit db.commit() (get_db has no commit-on-success; SAVEPOINT RELEASE alone
does not persist — without the commit the row rolls back on request teardown,
a silent no-op caught in code review). A persist failure never breaks the
response or poisons the session. Result serialized via jsonable_encoder→
json.dumps (handles embedded Pydantic models/dates); confidence/status
normalized to satisfy the 127 CHECK constraints (unknown→NULL/'complete').

Populate by-bbox last_analysis_date from v_analysis_runs_latest via a single
batch query (no N+1), replacing the #307 placeholder. The read is best-effort
wrapped too — a view-missing deploy window or future drift must not 500 the
map (falls back to last_analysis_date=None).

Additive only — analyze response shape unchanged. Tests: by-bbox suite patches
latest_run_dates (mock-db returns same rows for any query) + new test asserts
ISO last_analysis_date from a latest run. Analyze mock-suite unaffected
(graceful side_effect overflow + best-effort persist absorb the extra INSERT).
Incidental: ruff-format fixed one pre-existing f-string spacing (line ~2391)
the format hook flags on touch.

Closes #994. Refs #961.
2026-06-03 17:36:01 +05:00
0f194de069 feat(db): analysis_runs versioned store + latest-view §22 (#993)
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 38s
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 42s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m0s
Migration 127: durable, versioned, re-openable persistence for Site Finder
analysis runs (the §22 API result + forecast/recommendation/report snapshot).
One row = one completed analysis of a parcel (frozen result jsonb =
SiteFinderReport.as_dict() #987, schema_version for versioned re-open).
Append-mostly (history/versioning — never overwrites prior runs → TABLE not MV).

Replaces the last_analysis_date=None placeholder (parcels.py:1026,1092):
"date of last analysis" + "current analysis of parcel" now come from
v_analysis_runs_latest (DISTINCT ON cad_num, max created_at, deterministic
id-DESC tiebreak — mirrors v_supply_layers_latest m.125).

created_by = X-Authenticated-User identity, nullable TEXT, NO FK (no users
table; precedent m.90/m.119; background/Celery runs have no author). result/
params/segment as JSONB (report shape evolves); district/confidence/status
denormalized out for filter/sort. status + confidence CHECK-guarded.
Idempotent (CREATE TABLE/INDEX IF NOT EXISTS + CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW).

Dry-run-verified vs prod catalog (DDL applies clean in rolled-back txn;
DISTINCT ON latest-wins confirmed). Foundation for #994 persist + #992
contract. Closes #993. Refs #961.
2026-06-03 17:14:47 +05:00
c06dc0f5d6 feat(db): Dom.РФ housing/escrow → macro_indicator §7.10 (#946, partial)
All checks were successful
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 34s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 41s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 59s
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Migration 126: aggregate already-scraped domrf_kn_sale_graph + domrf_kn_objects
into monthly macro_indicator series (source=domrf): housing_price_per_m2
(area-weighted, latest-snapshot deduped — naive SUM double-counts 2.7x),
new_contracts_volume (Σ contracted ДДУ/mo), escrow_objects_count (escrow FLAG,
not balances — caveat documented). Regions sverdl (region_cd=66) + rf (all
scraped — currently = sverdl, domrf_kn covers region 66 only). Idempotent
ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE; dry-run-verified vs prod (price ~156k ₽/m², dedup
45792→16853, escrow 460). Pure SQL, data already scraped.

EMISS CPI/income (§7.11) DEFERRED: fedstat.ru WAF-blocks non-browser clients
(JA3) — needs stealth.py browser-fetch generalization (separate effort, low
priority while §9.6 forecast is advisory). Refs #946.
2026-06-03 17:05:33 +05:00
e46993dfa8 feat(#978b): Source A + detrend in rate-sensitivity backtest (#1025)
All checks were successful
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 28s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 29s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m2s
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
2026-06-03 09:51:48 +00:00
6f06ca7f16 feat(forecasting): read-only OOS backtest of §9.6 rate-sensitivity (#978) (#1024)
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 41s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 44s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m0s
2026-06-03 09:33:02 +00:00
12162a0abb feat(exporters): Site Finder report PDF exporter (#989, 955-A3) (#1023)
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 3m23s
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 3m30s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m7s
2026-06-03 09:09:30 +00:00
299f2365fb feat(exporters): Excel exporter for SiteFinderReport (#991, 955-A5) (#1022)
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m24s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m24s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m40s
2026-06-03 08:57:00 +00:00
fc312fe606 feat(forecasting): §13 report assembler (#988, 955-A2) (#1021)
All checks were successful
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m22s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m36s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m13s
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
2026-06-03 08:51:23 +00:00
47fe5a55eb feat(forecasting): §15 confidence engine v2 (#990, 955-A4) (#1020)
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 6s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m24s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m58s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m16s
2026-06-03 08:41:07 +00:00
75c9b34987 feat(forecasting): §13 SiteFinderReport object (#987, 955-A1) (#1019)
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 6s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m24s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m43s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m14s
2026-06-03 08:33:01 +00:00
008f9d9ed1 feat(forecasting): §25 six special indices (#986, 954-C) (#1018)
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m28s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m31s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m8s
2026-06-03 08:24:08 +00:00
98dea0315a feat(forecasting): §14.2 product scoring card (#985, 954-B) (#1017)
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 6s
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m33s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m30s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m10s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
2026-06-03 08:11:54 +00:00
8057468c13 feat(forecasting): §11 macro-scenarios (#984, 954-A) (#1016)
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 2m29s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 3m37s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m21s
2026-06-03 07:59:22 +00:00
691ccef4b7 feat(forecasting): class/commercial/USP §10.2/10.4/10.5 + §16 (#983, 953-B) (#1015)
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 6s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m32s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m32s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m10s
2026-06-03 07:52:24 +00:00
72e9b24f2c feat(recommend): horizon-aware recommend_mix opt-in overlay (#982, 953-A) (#1014)
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m24s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m33s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m4s
2026-06-03 07:40:33 +00:00
489e380f1e feat(forecasting): what-to-build ranker + MAI proxy (#981, 952-B) (#1013)
All checks were successful
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m31s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m43s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m9s
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
2026-06-03 07:07:17 +00:00
70ffa399fc feat(forecasting): demand-supply forecast engine (#980, 952-A) (#1012)
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m24s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m28s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m10s
2026-06-03 06:56:33 +00:00
9758e21cbd feat(forecasting): §9.4 demand-normalization coefficient (#951f, advisory) (#1011)
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m22s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m34s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m5s
2026-06-03 06:28:14 +00:00
69ad6c87fc feat(forecasting): §9.5 macro coefficient (#951e, advisory) (#1010)
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m22s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 3m27s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m11s
2026-06-03 06:20:04 +00:00
f41e2536d8 feat(forecasting): §9.6 key-rate sensitivity module (#951d, advisory) (#1009)
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m30s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m39s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m13s
2026-06-03 06:06:16 +00:00
c7bfc9e22a feat(forecasting): monthly sales series builder for §9.6 (#951c) (#1008)
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m20s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m17s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m6s
2026-06-03 05:52:33 +00:00
ace3b99508 feat(forecasting): monthly macro series + regime classifier (#951b) (#1007)
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m23s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m43s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m5s
2026-06-03 05:37:43 +00:00
a10592847d feat(site_finder): future-supply-pressure index (#950 Step 6) (#1006)
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m20s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m23s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m5s
2026-06-03 05:10:08 +00:00
ae85f19993 feat(workers): supply-layers refresh task + weekly beat (#950 Step 5) (#1005)
All checks were successful
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m22s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m9s
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 6s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m22s
2026-06-02 20:47:05 +00:00
900802264a feat(site-finder): supply_layers v2 compute service (#950 EPIC6 step3+4) (#1004)
All checks were successful
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m30s
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m40s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m6s
2026-06-02 20:34:26 +00:00
33ecbda689 feat(db): supply_layers store + latest view (#950 PR B) (#1003)
All checks were successful
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 28s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 59s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 6s
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 28s
2026-06-02 20:21:04 +00:00
420cda2831 feat(domrf): persist domrf_kn_objects.free_flats (#950 PR A) (#1002)
All checks were successful
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m26s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m27s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m7s
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
2026-06-02 20:06:29 +00:00
59be55f80e feat(site-finder): per-competitor relevance_weight (#949 PR B) (#1000)
All checks were successful
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 6s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m34s
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m26s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m10s
2026-06-02 19:45:38 +00:00
45d61ecff0 feat(site_finder): market-metrics service (#949 PR A, §9.2) (#997)
All checks were successful
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m30s
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 3m49s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m10s
2026-06-02 19:26:26 +00:00
c78c6ec2d0 feat(site-finder): live CBR key-rate scraper → macro_indicator (#945 PR B) (#964)
All checks were successful
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m10s
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 6s
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 1m24s
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m53s
2026-06-02 19:05:57 +00:00
dbae4b0bda feat(site-finder): macro_indicator table + backfill + reader (#945 PR A) (#963)
All checks were successful
Deploy / build-frontend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy / build-worker (push) Successful in 2m20s
Deploy / build-backend (push) Successful in 2m32s
Deploy / deploy (push) Successful in 1m14s
Deploy / changes (push) Successful in 6s
2026-06-02 18:41:28 +00:00
6e2bb80690 Merge pull request 'fix(tradein): collapse CRM block + density so input form fits laptops' (#943) from fix/tradein-form-fit-laptops into main
All checks were successful
Deploy Trade-In / changes (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy Trade-In / test (push) Has been skipped
Deploy Trade-In / build-backend (push) Has been skipped
Deploy Trade-In / build-browser (push) Has been skipped
Deploy Trade-In / build-frontend (push) Successful in 1m42s
Deploy Trade-In / deploy (push) Successful in 44s
Reviewed-on: #943
2026-06-01 08:02:47 +00:00