116cd10046
All checks were successful
CI / changes (pull_request) Successful in 9s
CI Trade-In / changes (pull_request) Successful in 10s
CI Trade-In / frontend-checks (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / backend-tests (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / frontend-tests (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / openapi-codegen-check (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI Trade-In / backend-tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m39s
Code-review follow-up: the Group C regression tests for the fetch_detail backconnect footgun and AvitoScraper's config requirement proved the KIT LIBRARY behavior in isolation, but nothing asserted the actual call sites in avito_detail_backfill.py still pass config=RealScraperConfig() at fetch_detail and AvitoScraper construction. Mirrors #2306's test_backfill_wave2.py:282-286 pattern -- isinstance-checks the captured call_args instead of a bare assert_called(). Verified the new assertions actually catch the regression: temporarily removed both config=RealScraperConfig() call-site args from avito_detail_backfill.py, confirmed test_backfill_processes_snapshot_to_completion fails exactly on the new assertion line, then restored (git diff was empty afterward). Refs #2310 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| __init__.py | ||
| test_avito_detail_backfill.py | ||
| test_backfill_listings_coords_geoportal.py | ||
| test_cadastral_geo_match.py | ||
| test_geocode_missing.py | ||
| test_newbuilding_enrich_backfill.py | ||
| test_yandex_address_backfill.py | ||
| test_yandex_detail_backfill.py | ||
| test_yandex_newbuilding_sweep.py | ||